Skip to content
- My peers think that I should provide a little bit more evidence from the narratives, and to connect it to the articles. My narratives focus specifically on the withholding of literacy by sponsors and how that defines the perspective of the individual and how that impacts the way they view themselves.
- I believe that I should improve my overall introductions to each text. I mainly attempted to combine the introductions to each inside of the normal analysis body paragraphs, but I find that the introductions I provided are not sufficient in fully encapsulating the specific work of the authors that we are using.
- One idea I am looking into specifically is using an additional narrative to contrast with the ones I am already using so that I can build up both sides of the table and make it more effective. I think that my narratives and articles are fairly balanced in terms of evidence, I think my main issue is making a more concise, prominent claim in my paper.
